refugees in Australia

First nation-wide research of how people seeking asylum in Australia are affected by our higher ed policies

In the last few years, great strides have been made regarding access to higher education for people seeking asylum in Australia. Advocates have worked tirelessly to raise awareness of the educational aspirations and needs of this vulnerable and frequently overlooked cohort of learners. Scholarships and fee-waivers have been introduced at many institutions, and our research shows that over 204 people seeking asylum are currently studying at 23 universities across the country, thanks to scholarships that meet their full tuition fees.

However, there are many more people seeking asylum for whom higher education remains an elusive dream. Funded by the National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education (NCSEHE), our team – Dr Lisa Hartley (Curtin University), A/Prof Caroline Fleay (Curtin University), Dr Sally Baker (University of New South Wales), Dr Rachel Burke (University of Newcastle), and Rebecca Field (Curtin University) – undertook the first nation-wide study of educational policies and practices affecting people seeking asylum in Australia.

We spoke with current and former students from asylum seeker backgrounds, as well as those hoping to participate in higher education. We also interviewed community advocates, caseworkers, university staff, and academics whose individual efforts – while often unacknowledged – are critical to educational access for people seeking asylum.

While it is clear that many important bridges to tertiary studies have been implemented in the last three years, there are far more barriers continuing to render higher education an impossible dream for most. This further disadvantages this already vulnerable population, diminishing their employment potential and significantly undermining positive resettlement prospects and social inclusion.

Who are people seeking asylum?

People seeking asylum have fled their country of origin due to war, religious or ethnic persecution, or other human rights violations, and have applied for international protection. For much of the past six years, approximately 30, 000 people have resided in community detention or lived in the community on temporary Bridging Visas while awaiting the processing of their claim for refugee status in Australia. If deemed eligible for protection, the Government issues refugees one of two temporary visas: a three year Temporary Protection Visa (TPV) or a five year Safe Haven Enterprise Visa (SHEV). As at July 2018 there were still 12, 290 people awaiting an outcome on their claim for refugee status.

Unlike people with permanent protection, such as those offered resettlement through Australia’s Refugee and Humanitarian Programme, people seeking asylum are ineligible for a range of services. Access to higher education is a key area in which this differential eligibility for government assistance is most pronounced. School leaver Soumi Gopalakrishnan’s situation, which was recently reported in the news, illustrates the barriers to higher education confronting many people seeking asylum.

What are some of the major barriers to higher education for people seeking asylum?

Most people seeking asylum in Australia have study rights. However, the temporary nature of their visa means the only pathway to higher education is to be granted admission as a full-fee paying international student. This pathway is entirely financially prohibitive for almost all people seeking asylum, particularly as they are ineligible for government assistance to finance tertiary education.

Further, recipients of Special Benefit (the welfare payment available to people seeking asylum) who wish to pursue higher education can only continue to receive income support if they are undertaking a vocational course that is likely to enhance their employment prospects and can be completed in 12 months or less. The recent removal of Status Resolution Support Services (SRSS) income for people deemed ‘job ready’ also illustrates that people seeking asylum are expected to support themselves if they wish to study.

Therefore, even if a person is awarded one of the few scholarships covering the entire cost of university fees, without an accompanying living allowance, they are still required to work long hours to afford basic living expenses, seriously detracting from their ability to focus on their education.

Some students have told us that succeeding in their studies meant having to forego work (and therefore food and stable accommodation) to focus their attention on completing assignments. In these circumstances, charitable organisations such as the Red Cross are often the only means of assistance.

The temporary visa status of people seeking asylum also creates difficulties in accessing enabling courses, government-funded English language classes, and other supports for successful transition into higher education that are available to other students. Ineligibility for these important pathways and services significantly disadvantages people seeking asylum, many of whom have experienced interrupted schooling and require specific forms of academic language and literacies support.

Therefore, should they manage to attend university, people seeking asylum – one of the most educationally disadvantaged populations in Australia – are required to succeed with the least amount of support.

The stresses of adjusting to academic life, financial difficulties, and living in an extremely precarious and uncertain situation have a significant, negative impact on students’ mental health. These concerns, combined with ongoing trauma from past experiences, separation from family, and mental health impacts of detention weigh heavily and act as further barriers to higher education, making it difficult to focus on study.

What are some of the bridges to higher education for people seeking asylum?

University scholarships that cover full tuition fees and provide living allowances and other supports are essential bridges to higher education for people seeking asylum. In the last three years, community organisations have been instrumental in advocating for scholarships and providing support to people seeking asylum as they navigate complex application and admission processes. Community advocates have provided these bridges to higher education within an extremely changeable political and policy context, and with ever decreasing funding.

However, as stated, if a university does not offer a scholarship that meets the full cost of tuition, this bridge effectively becomes a barrier to accessing higher education. The cost of living and lack of support significantly reduces the possibility of successfully balancing work and study within the context of severe financial vulnerability.

Many students attempting to study while seeking asylum express a preference for part-time degrees that incorporate part-time employment opportunities and subsidised accommodation. Part-time employment assists with professional networking and workplace experience – essential for successful resettlement in Australia – while allowing students to meet living expenses.

Some universities also offer alternative entrance pathways, such as enabling programs or diploma pathways. These programs, which often have a reduced study load, are proving to be important bridges to successful transition to university, providing the opportunity to develop familiarity with academic practices, language, and literacies requirements, as well as insight into disciplinary content.

Bespoke academic assistance that acknowledges the diverse educational needs and background experiences of people seeking asylum and is provided throughout their studies must to be accompanied by ongoing and highly accessible mental health support offered by practitioners with experience working with people from asylum-seeking backgrounds.

Having a dedicated university staff member to support students who are seeking asylum to successfully transition into and though their studies is also essential. Students often require assistance to navigate siloed university departments where welfare services, admissions, international student departments, and faculties do not always have opportunities to communicate. Ideally, a dedicated support person will have lived experience of seeking asylum.

Moving forward: strengthening bridges and reducing barriers to education for people seeking asylum

Federal Government policies underpinning the most significant barriers that people seeking asylum face in accessing higher education need to be addressed, including the requirement for permanent protection visas to be issued to all who have been recognised as a refugee. Ensuring all people seeking asylum and refugees have access to income and student supports, on par with other Australians, is key.

Ensuring that people with lived experience of seeking asylum inform policy and practice is also essential. Providing effective support requires first-hand understanding of the unique circumstances of living on a temporary visa.

The determination and commitment of people seeking asylum to their studies, while living in situations of extreme uncertainty and receiving minimal supports compared with most other students in Australia, needs to be lauded. The university and community organisations responsible for implementing scholarships and other supports are also to be commended.

However, change is needed to properly ensure these students receive the assistance necessary for their access, retention, participation, and success in academic endeavours and in their resettlement in Australia. University and community sector advocacy efforts directed at realising this are critical.

For more information on the first nation-wide investigation of educational policies and practices affecting people seeking asylum in Australia please see People Seeking Asylum in Australia: Access and Support in Higher Education or contact Dr Lisa Hartley, Chief Investigator:


Rachel Burke is an Applied Linguist and Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) educator and researcher in the School of Education, at the University of Newcastle. Rachel takes a critical discourse analytic approach. Her work focuses on linguistically and culturally diverse educational contexts, the critical examination of policyscape, structural mechanisms for inclusion/exclusion, and praxis-driven approaches to languages and literacies education.


Sally Baker is a Lecturer of Social Research and Policy in the School of Social Sciences, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia. She is affiliated with the Forced Migration Research Network (FMRN@UNSW). Sally’s research explores issues of equity in higher education, with her research interests including higher education equity and language policy, the educational experiences of students from refugee and culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds, academic literacies, transitions, and methodological issues and longitudinal qualitative research. She is currently working on a National Centre for Student Equity in Higher Education-funded project which is examining university and community responses to higher education and people seeking asylum with colleagues from Curtin University and the University of Newcastle. Sally is also the Co-Chair of the Refugee Education Special Interest Group, which is hosted by the Refugee Council of Australia and the Multicultural Youth Advocacy Network.

Further information regarding university scholarships in Australia for people seeking asylum, see Refugee Council of Australia (RCOA).  

Rachel Burke and Sally Baker will be presenting on this research at the 2018 AARE Conference on Wednesday 5th December. The title of their presentation is Barriers to Higher Education Confronting People Seeking Asylum: Investigating the Impact of University and Community Responses’ 


AARE Refugee Statement

The Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) is deeply concerned about the severe impact and harm being caused to refugees in immigration detention in Australia. We add our voice to the list of associations, organisations and professions that condemn the current situation on Manus Island and Nauru, and Australian refugee and asylum seeker policies more generally.

It is now more difficult to accurately ascertain how many people remain in the offshore processing system because of how the Australian Government reports on: issues related to asylum seekers; numbers of people living in ‘regional processing centres’; and those left living outside the ‘regional processing centres’. However, other sources indicate that the situation remains dire. Amnesty International estimates that the Australian government has ‘indefinitely trapped over 1,200 men, women and children on Nauru and over 800 men on Manus Island’, and the Refugee Council estimates that there are more than 900 people left in Nauru and more than 700 left in Papua New Guinea.

AARE is the national association for fostering educational research in Australia. Established in 1970, AARE promotes, supports and improves research and scholarship in education to enhance educational processes, policy and practice at all levels, for the public good.

The following statement was signed by over 200 AARE members and sent to the Prime Minister, the Minister for Department of Home Affairs and the leader of the Opposition late in 2017. A year later it seems that little has changed. This situation seems indefensible and we call for the well-being of those who remain within the asylum seeker offshore detention system to take priority as a human rights issue over politics.


The Australian Association for Research in Education (AARE) condemns the inhumane treatment of refugees and asylum seekers on Manus Island. 

We demand that the Australian government urgently provide medical services, food, water, and other services to those in need, and to take immediate action to resettle these asylum seekers and refugees safely.

We believe that the current situation whereby asylum seekers and refugees have been abandoned is a breach of their basic human rights. We regard the current situation on Manus Island to be the product of an indefensible refugee policy. We call on the Federal Government and the Opposition to make immediate changes to Australia’s refugee and asylum seeker policies, including a review of practices related to off shore detention within centres on locations such as Manus Island and Nauru. Children, families and adults are currently being held in detention for long periods of time under Australian authority, and as educators we condemn this policy.


Thanks to the many AARE members who supported this statement and particularly those members who first presented this as a motion at the AGM and who helped write the original Statement.